Inspectorate as Intern Supervisors (2)

Inspectorate as Intern Supervisors (2) By: Helmi
[Governor of Jambi Province, HBA]
Governor of Jambi Province, HBA In the Governor Regulation (gubernatorial) Jambi No. 31 Year 2008 regarding the Duty and its Function Description Unit of the Organization At Inspectorate, and the Regional Technical Institute Bappeda Jambi Province, as amended by No. Pergub. 4 In 2011, the Inspectorate has the task to supervise the implementation of government affairs in the Province, the implementation guidance for the organization of Local Government, district / city and execution of government affairs at the Regency / Municipality (Article 2).
Article 3 Pergub above states, the Leader has the Inspector Inspector has the task to implement the provisions referred to in Article 2, to lead and coordinate all activities of the Secretariat, Assistant Superintendent and Functional Group.
Regarding the Secretariat on Article 4 states (1) The Secretariat has the task to prepare materials and provide oversight of coordination and functional administrarif services to all elements within the Provincial Inspectorate (2) To carry out the tasks as in paragraph (1).
The function of the secretariat is the first, prepare materials and plan the coordination and control of surveillance work program. Second, collect, manage, rate and save report results of surveillance apparatus, the Regional Functional supervision. Third, compile the data material in order functional technical coaching. Fourth, organize, and coordinate the inventory data in order stylists company complaint handling process. Fifth, conduct affairs personnel, finance, suratmenyurat and households.
As the agency's internal watchdog (extension task local leaders), the results of surveillance in Jambi Province Inspectorate shall be submitted to regional leaders, the Governor of Jambi. Inspector as a leader to submit a report with recommendations of monitoring follow-up with evidence.
In carrying out internal supervision duties, the Inspectorate should comply with the code of conduct as auditor. Code of ethics is the norm for the behavior of the internal watchdog officials not to deviate to the interests of the leadership in realizing good governance. That is, an Inspector in the framework of internal control should be, first, be careful to use and maintain all information relating to the examination.
Second, do not use the information obtained for personal or group interests. Third, should not be doing things that give rise to conflicts of interest. Fourth, independent and objective in performing the task.
Some examples of the above cases, seen from the main tasks and functions of the Inspectorate as an internal watchdog of government activities in the provinces of Jambi and Inspector, as leader of the Inspectorate can be said to have been wrong to use power (abuse of power). The reason, the Superintendent has presented the results to the public before the first report (written) examination results to the Governor.
Second, although the inspectorate can perform exposure (exposure) results of the report, does not mean all of the cases examined can be exposed to mass media (although it has not been checked or not checked at all).
Third, the most densely populated and already examined the case of public consumption, but its substance is not the authority of the Inspectorate of Jambi Province. Fourth, the action presents the results of the examination to the public let alone the scope of authority is not party to attack a certain impression that "unwelcome". In fact, PP. 60 In 2008, regulations and internal control Pergub done for the benefit of regional leaders (in this case the Governor) to realize good governance. Examination results are not to be excessive public consumption.
Based on the above, should the Governor of Jambi enforce norms of supervision in accordance with the code of conduct Governance Internal Control System (SPIP) and the main tasks, function (Auth) Inspectorate as an internal government watchdog. Otherwise, it will cause unrest in society and disrupt the running of the government in the province of Jambi. The first result, the implementation of good governance and development difficult to achieve. Second, more importantly Jambi GOLD threatened to be achieved precisely with the behavior of government officials who tend to violate tupoksinya. (*)